Description
The project I'm building a German-language magazine on longevity, fitness, nutrition and sleep — evidence-based, editorial in tone, aimed at an educated and sceptical audience. The defining feature is a transparent evidence rating: every article, glossary term and recommendation carries a visible rating of how solid the underlying science actually is. It is what separates the site from the usual supplement marketing, and building that component well is the heart of this job. This is a private long-term project, not agency work. It's already carefully thought through — I've written the brief, the content model and the mockups myself, and I have roughly 360 finished glossary entries waiting to be imported. The interesting part The evidence rating is not a badge you drop in a template. It is: Five states — three of them points on an evidence scale (solid / promising / hype), two of them orthogonal categories that deliberately render differently. Three rendering variants from a single source value: a compact inline chip (automatic, appears wherever an item is listed), a header badge (automatic, one per article), and a detailed in-body callout (placed manually by me, mid-article). Taxonomy-driven, not post meta — so listings and category hubs can filter by it cheaply. A Gutenberg block with server-side render, plus an equivalent shortcode fallback. Both are needed: I draft articles as Markdown outside WordPress and paste them in, and blocks don't survive a paste. Built for volume.